© 2026 WUKY
background_fid.jpg
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

A bill restricting student-teacher communication prompted pushback last year. Will revisions clear up the confusion?

In this March 11, 2014 photo, Lexi Hough, 14, works through a math problem with her iPad at the ready in her eighth grade algebra class at The St. Michael School of Clayton in Clayton, Mo. At the school in suburban St. Louis, students are learning how to manage their digital reputations, why retailers rely on facial recognition software and other legal and ethical issues raised by spending hours each day online or texting with friends. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)
Jeff Roberson/AP
/
AP
In this March 11, 2014 photo, Lexi Hough, 14, works through a math problem with her iPad at the ready in her eighth grade algebra class at The St. Michael School of Clayton in Clayton, Mo. At the school in suburban St. Louis, students are learning how to manage their digital reputations, why retailers rely on facial recognition software and other legal and ethical issues raised by spending hours each day online or texting with friends. (AP Photo/Jeff Roberson)

State lawmakers have advanced a bill that seeks to fix a number of issues and complaints surrounding a 2025 measure limiting private communications between students and teachers and other school staff.

The original bill, which sailed through the General Assembly with little resistance last year, was meant, in the words of the sponsor, to "close off the most easily accessible access point" where bad actors might connect with children. It's central requirement — mandating that school staff communicate with students only through school-approved applications and email systems — proved complicated in practice.

Sen. Lindsey Tichenor said the new revisions are meant to address the questions that arose after the bill took effect.

"We brought together a lot of ideas and were able to come up with some solutions that I think will meet the needs to make this bill effective but not lose its intent," Sen. Lindsey Tichenor told colleagues Thursday.

Senate Bill 181 expands a number of definitions. Take the term "family member," for example. That's now been broadened to include cousins, blood relatives, relatives by marriage, and adopted family.

As for new exemptions from the rule, Tichenor laid out a series of situations, including "virtual school instruction, electronic translation services, calling or texting a phone number provided by the parent, communications with a parent included as a recipient."

While some lawmakers noted the volume of frustrated calls and communications they received from concerned constituents, the proposed changes were overwhelmingly welcomed in committee and the bill received unanimous support on its way to the full Senate Thursday.