© 2025 WUKY
background_fid.jpg
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

SCOTUS hears arguments in pivotal challenge to Voting Rights Act

US Supreme Court, Washington DC,
flysnow - stock.adobe.com
/
81744740
US Supreme Court, Washington DC,

The U-S Supreme Court heard arguments this week in a case that legal experts say could undercut the heart of the Voting Rights Act and impact voting across the country.

Tribal advocates are watching closely, as a similar legal fight is unfolding concerning Native American districts in North Dakota. The case heard this week stems from the drawing of political boundaries in Louisiana. Plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Act, which prohibits racial discrimination regarding voting practices and procedures.

Jacqueline De León, senior staff attorney for The Native American Rights Fund, said there is a presumption from challengers that barriers to civic engagement are a thing of the past for minority populations.

"And unfortunately, what we know through our work across Indian Country is that racial discrimination is alive and well, and that, unfortunately, Native voters are discriminated against often," she explained.

She said drastically changing Section 2 would embolden states to redraw maps that further weaken the voting power of communities of color. The legal push from conservatives comes as President Donald Trump pressures GOP-led states to update their maps before the 2026 midterms. Plaintiffs contend sthat till factoring in race during redistricting is discriminatory.

In the North Dakota case, tribal advocates appealed to the high court last month, focusing on whether private citizens can sue to enforce Section 2. De León said that while these cases have some differences, they both signal a critical juncture for longstanding legal protections.

"Both cases represent an existential threat to the Voting Rights Act, and it's incredibly important that voters and that just American citizens are aware that our foundational civil rights statute is under threat," she continued.

De León wouldn't speculate on upcoming decisions, but legal experts say in the Louisiana case, several conservative justices appeared poised to side with the plaintiffs. Those experts say Section 2 is the last remaining pillar of the Voting Rights Act, with other elements recently facing setbacks in the courts. However, the Supreme Court did rule in 2023 that Alabama Republicans likely violated the law when drawing their maps.

Mike Moen is a radio news reporter with nearly two decades of experience in the field. He has covered much of the upper Midwest, including Minnesota, Illinois, Wisconsin and the Dakotas. Many of his stories have aired nationally, including several public radio programs.